AWS IAM vs WorkOS
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
WorkOS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 9.5 versus 5.1 for AWS IAM, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose AWS IAM if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or ISO 9001 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP or DoD SRG or PCI DSS Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Well suited to infrastructure centered on AWS
- Free core federation and multi-account management
Choose WorkOS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.5 vs 5.1)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or SIG Lite coverage
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
- Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AWS IAM | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.1% | 9.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−1.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #19 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 3% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AWS IAM +5.1pp · WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
WorkOS leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | AWS IAM | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #7 | #13 |
| Compare the leading Identity & Access Management platforms | Perplexity | #9 | #11 |
| Which identity and access management platform has transparent pricing? | AI Mode | #1 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AWS IAM | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud APIs and SDKs |
| Integrations | — | 20+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 9001, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP, DoD SRG, PCI DSS Level 1 | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite |
| Support | — | Email support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls |
| Founded | — | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Seed · $195M raised |
| Best for | — | SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations. |
Plans side by side
AWS IAM
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AWS IAM
- Well suited to infrastructure centered on AWS
- Free core federation and multi-account management
- Ranked second overall by ISG
- Listed among strong identity platforms for 2026
WorkOS
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
- Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
- Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
- Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
- Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
- Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AWS IAM vs WorkOS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aws-iam-vs-workos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.