AWSVisual low-code tool for building AWS-backed apps from Figma designs
vs
CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
AWS vs CyberArk
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 14.1 for AWS, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose AWS if…
- You need SOC 1 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS Level 1 or FedRAMP or DoD SRG or ISO 9001 or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Core federation and multi-account management included at no extra charge
- Enterprise-grade reliability and uptime on AWS infrastructure
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 14.1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 16% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AWS | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.1% | 15.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | up+2.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #9 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 5.1% | 6.1% |
| Mentions this run | 15 | 19 |
| Positive in AI answers | 16% | 49% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AWS +14.1pp · CyberArk +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AWSCyberArk
Head to head in AI answers
12 engine answers name both brands
6AWS ranked higher
6CyberArk ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AWS | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Self-hosted and SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, PCI DSS Level 1, FedRAMP, DoD SRG, ISO 9001, ISO 27001 | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | — | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community |
| Founded | 2021 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | Newton, MA, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Post-IPO debt |
| Best for | — | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AWS
- Core federation and multi-account management included at no extra charge
- Enterprise-grade reliability and uptime on AWS infrastructure
- Pay-as-you-go, usage-based pricing
- Deep integration with the AWS ecosystem and AI tools
- Recognised by analysts such as Gartner and ISG
- Requires strong AWS engineering or technical expertise
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AWS vs CyberArk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aws-vs-cyberark, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.