BigtincanAI-powered sales enablement platform for customer-facing teams
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Bigtincan vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Bigtincan is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.7 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Bigtincan if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.7 vs 1.5)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Qwilr if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Bigtincan | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #26 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bigtincan 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Bigtincan leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
BigtincanQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Bigtincan ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bigtincan | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 75+ | — |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Bronze Support, Silver Support, Gold Support, Platinum Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Post-IPO equity · $49M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Customer-facing teams in field selling-centric organizations | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bigtincan
Profile in progress.
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bigtincan vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bigtincan-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.