Bolt.newBuild stunning apps & websites, just by prompting.
vs
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Bolt.new vs Claris FileMaker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Claris FileMaker is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 1.6 versus 0.3 for Bolt.new.
Choose Bolt.new if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.6 vs 0.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($22 vs $25)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Bolt.new | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 1.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #43 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bolt.new +0.3pp · Claris FileMaker +1.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Claris FileMaker leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Bolt.newClaris FileMaker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Bolt.new ranked higher
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bolt.new | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 |
| Support | Community, Email, Priority support on Pro and Teams, 24/7 priority support on Enterprise | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Sunnyvale, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B · $135M raised | Later Stage VC · $1M raised |
| Best for | Entrepreneurs, small businesses, product managers, marketers, agencies and students who want to build apps or websites by prompting | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises |
Plans side by side
Bolt.new
Free$0month
Pro$25month
Teams$30per member per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual contract
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bolt.new
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bolt.new vs Claris FileMaker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bolt-new-vs-claris-filemaker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.