BudibaseBuild AI agents, chat and automate internal workflows instantly.
vs
n8nFlexible AI workflow automation for technical teams.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Budibase vs n8n
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Budibase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 5.2 versus 1.3 for n8n.
Choose Budibase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.2 vs 1.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 57% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
Choose n8n if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Budibase | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.2% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.5% | down−1.6% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #20 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Budibase −0.5pp · n8n −1.5999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Budibase leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Budibasen8n
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Budibase ranked higher
0n8n ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Budibase | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase Cloud | Hosted on n8n Cloud or self-hosted on-prem or with Docker. |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Community forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise | Forum support on all plans, Email support on Enterprise, Dedicated support with SLA on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Belfast, Northern Ireland | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raised | Series C · $240M raised |
| Best for | IT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host. | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. |
Plans side by side
Budibase
Pro$19month
Premium$49month
Business$299month
Enterprise (Cloud)Customcustom
Open source$0free (self-host)
Enterprise (Self-host)Customcustom
n8n
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Budibase
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
- free with no user limit
- low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards
n8n
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Budibase vs n8n”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/budibase-vs-n8n, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.