BudibaseBuild AI agents, chat and automate internal workflows instantly.
vs
SoftrBuild secure custom portals and internal tools with AI, no code required.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Budibase vs Softr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Softr is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 5.4 versus 5.2 for Budibase, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Budibase if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 22% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
Choose Softr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.4 vs 5.2)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR coverage
- Free plan for creating basic business apps
- Beginner-friendly, little or no programming experience needed
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Budibase | Softr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.2% | 5.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.5% | down−2.5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #20 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 22% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Budibase −0.5pp · Softr −2.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Softr leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
BudibaseSoftr
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
3Budibase ranked higher
0Softr ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Budibase | Softr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #11 | #15 |
| Is there a free low-code platform for small teams? | ChatGPT | #2 | #5 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | ChatGPT | #4 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Budibase | Softr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase Cloud | Cloud-hosted SaaS built on AWS |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR |
| Support | Community forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise | Email (support@softr.io), Community forum, Help docs, Softr Academy |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Belfast, Northern Ireland | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Seed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raised | Series A · $16M raised |
| Best for | IT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host. | Non-technical business teams and departments that need client portals, CRMs, intranets and internal tools without waiting on developers. |
Plans side by side
Budibase
Pro$19month
Premium$49month
Business$299month
Enterprise (Cloud)Customcustom
Open source$0free (self-host)
Enterprise (Self-host)Customcustom
Softr
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Budibase
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
- free with no user limit
- low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards
Softr
- Free plan for creating basic business apps
- Beginner-friendly, little or no programming experience needed
- Works with Airtable, Google Sheets, or BigQuery as a backend
- Good for data-driven portals and directories
- Suited to simple small-business applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Budibase vs Softr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/budibase-vs-softr, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.