Ceipal ATSUnified Talent Platform for Hiring, Vendors & Workforce
vs
LeverModern recruiting software that combines ATS and CRM capabilities
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ceipal ATS vs Lever
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Lever is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 22.2 versus 1.4 for Ceipal ATS, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Ceipal ATS if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 44% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
Choose Lever if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.2 vs 1.4)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
- Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
- Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ceipal ATS | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 22.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #50 | #3 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 6.3% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 34 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ceipal ATS 0pp · Lever 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Lever leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Ceipal ATSLever
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Ceipal ATS ranked higher
1Lever ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Ceipal ATS | Lever |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #16 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ceipal ATS | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001 |
| Support | Dedicated support | Customer Support, Phone (888) 885-5299 |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Rochester, NY | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Series B | Series D |
| Best for | Healthcare staffing firms, IT and general staffing firms, and enterprise recruiting teams | Small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ceipal ATS
Profile in progress.
Lever
- Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
- Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
- Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ceipal ATS vs Lever”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ceipal-ats-vs-lever, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.