Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
LeverModern recruiting software that combines ATS and CRM capabilities
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs Lever

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 22.2 for Lever, and ranks ahead in 97% of the answers that name both.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 22.2)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 44% positive)
  • You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards

Choose Lever if…

  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
  • Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
  • Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
  • Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse Lever
Visibility score38.5%22.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#3
Share of voice8.1%6.3%
Mentions this run4334
Positive in AI answers56%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · Lever 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
25%
AI Mode
33.5%
17.4%
Perplexity
38.3%
24.3%
GreenhouseLever

Head to head in AI answers

31 engine answers name both brands

30Greenhouse ranked higher
1Lever ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhouseLever
Pricing modelFlat tiers—
Entry priceContact sales—
Free planNo—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSSSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001
Support—Customer Support, Phone (888) 885-5299
Founded20122012
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesSan Francisco, CA
Employees501–1,000—
FundingSeries D · $110M raisedSeries D
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesSmall, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations.

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

Lever

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    Lever

    • Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
    • Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
    • Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs Lever”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-lever, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.