Ceipal ATS vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 1.4 for Ceipal ATS, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Ceipal ATS if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 44% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 1.4)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ceipal ATS | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #50 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ceipal ATS 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Ceipal ATS | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #16 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ceipal ATS | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 270+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Dedicated support | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Rochester, NY | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Healthcare staffing firms, IT and general staffing firms, and enterprise recruiting teams | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Ceipal ATS
Pricing not available.
Workable
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ceipal ATS
Profile in progress.
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ceipal ATS vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ceipal-ats-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.