Skip to content
SlateIndex
Ceipal ATSUnified Talent Platform for Hiring, Vendors & Workforce
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Ceipal ATS vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 1.4 for Ceipal ATS, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Ceipal ATS if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 44% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 coverage

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 1.4)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Ceipal ATS Workable
Visibility score1.4%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#50#2
Share of voice0.3%7.2%
Mentions this run238
Positive in AI answers50%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Ceipal ATS 1%

Ceipal ATS 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
4.1%
34.1%
AI Mode
0%
29.4%
Perplexity
0%
26.7%
Ceipal ATSWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Ceipal ATS ranked higher
1Workable ranked higher
PromptEngineCeipal ATSWorkable
Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors ChatGPT#16#9

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCeipal ATSWorkable
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$299 / mo
Free plan—No · 15-day trial
Deployment—Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations—270+
ComplianceSOC 2ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportDedicated supportPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20152012
HeadquartersRochester, NYBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees201–500201–500
FundingSeries BSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forHealthcare staffing firms, IT and general staffing firms, and enterprise recruiting teamsCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Ceipal ATS

Pricing not available.

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Ceipal ATS

Profile in progress.

Workable

  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial
  • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
  • candidate sourcing
  • costs more than lightweight ATS options

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ceipal ATS vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ceipal-ats-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.