Skip to content
SlateIndex
CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
WrikeThe work delivery platform for people and AI
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3

Celoxis vs Wrike

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 4.6 for Celoxis, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.

Choose Celoxis if…

  • You need ISO 27001 or AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
  • Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
  • Strong ratings in some comparison research

Choose Wrike if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 4.6)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 25% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Celoxis Wrike
Visibility score4.6%13.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Project Management#17#8
Share of voice1.5%4.4%
Mentions this run926
Positive in AI answers25%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Celoxis 5%

Celoxis 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Wrike leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.5%
18.9%
AI Mode
1.3%
2.2%
Perplexity
8.9%
19.3%
CeloxisWrike

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

1Celoxis ranked higher
4Wrike ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCeloxisWrike
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry price$10 per seat / moFree; paid from $10 per seat / mo
Free planNo · 14-day trialYes
DeploymentCloud or on-premiseCloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts
Integrations400+400+
ComplianceISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPRSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant
Support24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rolloutProfessional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support
Founded20012006
HeadquartersPune, IndiaSan Diego, California, US
Employees51–2001,001–5,000
Funding—Series B
Best forPMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together.Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale

Plans side by side

Celoxis

Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Celoxis pricing

Wrike

Free$0user/month
Team$10user/month
Business$25user/month
PinnacleCustomcustom pricing
ApexCustomcustom pricing
Wrike pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Celoxis

  • Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
  • Strong ratings in some comparison research

    Wrike

    • Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
    • Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
    • Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
    • Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
    • Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.