Claris FileMaker vs FlutterFlow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
FlutterFlow is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 5.8 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You want a lower entry price ($22 vs $39)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose FlutterFlow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.8 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
- Best for building native mobile apps for iOS and Android
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | FlutterFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 5.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #18 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 1.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · FlutterFlow −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
FlutterFlow leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | FlutterFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $39 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Browser-based builder; deploys to the App Store, Play Store and web |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type 1 |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Account & Billing Support, Community Support, Email Support, In-App Support |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | Mountain View, CA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | Series A · $28M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Solo founders shipping a first app, and enterprise teams scaling internal tools |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
FlutterFlow
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
FlutterFlow
- Best for building native mobile apps for iOS and Android
- Strong for cross-platform mobile and web apps
- High visual customizability
- Good for high-performance native apps
- Code ownership and option to add custom code later
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs FlutterFlow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-flutterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.