Claris FileMaker vs n8n
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Claris FileMaker is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 1.6 versus 1.3 for n8n.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.6 vs 1.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose n8n if…
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−1.6% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · n8n −1.5999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Claris FileMaker leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Hosted on n8n Cloud or self-hosted on-prem or with Docker. |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Forum support on all plans, Email support on Enterprise, Dedicated support with SLA on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | Series C · $240M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
n8n
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
n8n
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs n8n”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-n8n, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.