Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
vs
SoftrBuild secure custom portals and internal tools with AI, no code required.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Claris FileMaker vs Softr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Softr is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 5.4 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Softr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.4 vs 1.6)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR coverage
- Free plan for creating basic business apps
- Beginner-friendly, little or no programming experience needed
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | Softr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 5.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−2.5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 22% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · Softr −2.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Softr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Claris FileMakerSoftr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
0Softr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | Softr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Cloud-hosted SaaS built on AWS |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Email (support@softr.io), Community forum, Help docs, Softr Academy |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | Series A · $16M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Non-technical business teams and departments that need client portals, CRMs, intranets and internal tools without waiting on developers. |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Softr
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Softr
- Free plan for creating basic business apps
- Beginner-friendly, little or no programming experience needed
- Works with Airtable, Google Sheets, or BigQuery as a backend
- Good for data-driven portals and directories
- Suited to simple small-business applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs Softr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-softr, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.