Skip to content
SlateIndex
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Claris FileMaker vs UiPath

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

UiPath is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Claris FileMaker if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($22 vs $25)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

Choose UiPath if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 1.6)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Claris FileMaker UiPath
Visibility score1.6%2.4%
Change vs last weekNewup+1.8%
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#37#33
Share of voice0.3%0.6%
Mentions this run24
Positive in AI answers—38%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Claris FileMaker 2%

Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

UiPath leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.1%
4.6%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
3.7%
2.6%
Claris FileMakerUiPath

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Claris FileMaker ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher
PromptEngineClaris FileMakerUiPath
Which low-code platform offers a free trial? Perplexity#1#5

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionClaris FileMakerUiPath
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$22 per seat / moFree; paid from $25 / mo
Free planNoYes
DeploymentCloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server)Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5
SupportTechnical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forumsBronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum
Founded20192005
HeadquartersSunnyvale, CaliforniaNew York City, NY, United States
Employees201–5001,001–5,000
FundingLater Stage VC · $1M raisedIPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised
Best forTeams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprisesLarge enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform

Plans side by side

Claris FileMaker

Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Claris FileMaker pricing

UiPath

Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
UiPath pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Claris FileMaker

Profile in progress.

UiPath

  • Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
  • Fast implementation times compared with peers
  • Rated Exemplary by ISG
  • Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
  • Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.