Claris FileMaker vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You want a lower entry price ($22 vs $25)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Claris FileMaker | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #1 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2019 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.