Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
vs
WebflowThe agentic web platform for modern businesses
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Claris FileMaker vs Webflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Webflow is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.4 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Webflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.4 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 42001 or SOC 2 or SOC 1 Type 2 or PCI-DSS or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | Webflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 6.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | up+2.3% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 12 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · Webflow +2.3000000000000007pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Webflow leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Claris FileMakerWebflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
0Webflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | Webflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $15 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Cloud-hosted SaaS on managed infrastructure with a global CDN |
| Integrations | — | 431+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 42001, SOC 2, SOC 1 Type 2, PCI-DSS, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Help Center and Support Portal, Webflow University training, Priority support on the Team plan, Dedicated account manager on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | Series D · $335M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Marketing teams and designers who build, publish and manage websites without relying on developer tickets |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Webflow
Starter$0site/month
Basic$15site/month, billed yearly
Premium$25site/month, billed yearly
Team$2,500month, annual contract required
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Webflow
- Best for design-first websites and landing pages
- Powerful visual web design and CMS platform
- Suited to marketing sites and professional websites
- Annual billing savings on site and workspace plans
- Less suited to heavily governed enterprise systems
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs Webflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-webflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.