ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
CrewAIThe Enterprise Agent Build & Runtime for the work your business runs on
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs CrewAI
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CrewAI is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 17.5 versus 0.7 for Clay, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Clay if…
- You need ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose CrewAI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.5 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (43% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | CrewAI |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 17.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 4.9% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 30 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 43% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · CrewAI 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CrewAI leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayCrewAI
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Clay ranked higher
0CrewAI ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Clay | CrewAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top AI agent platform options for B2B SaaS companies | AI Mode | #4 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | CrewAI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | CrewAI cloud, customer VPC on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, or fully on-premises (AMP Factory). |
| Integrations | — | 1000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Community forum, Dedicated support with Slack/Teams channel, Support contact, On-site support |
| Founded | 2017 | — |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series B |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Enabling business and technical teams to build agents while giving platform teams the control to govern them. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
CrewAI
- Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo
- Strong for complex multi-agent and role-based workflows
- Free open-source Python framework
- Good for quickly prototyping multi-agent systems
- Industry standard for pro-code multi-agent orchestration
- Better suited to developers than nontechnical users
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs CrewAI”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-crewai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.