ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
DifyThe Platform for Production-Ready Agentic Workflows
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Dify
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Dify is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 5.2 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You want a lower entry price ($167 vs $590)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 27% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or CCPA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Dify if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.2 vs 0.7)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001:2022 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Dify |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 5.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #22 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 27% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Dify 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Dify leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayDify
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Dify ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Dify |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Free; paid from $590 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Dify Cloud, customer VPC, or self-hosted (Docker, Kubernetes via Helm chart) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Community Discord and forum support, Dedicated CSM and 24/7 support on Enterprise, Professional technical support on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | — |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series Pre-A |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Enterprise teams and developers who need to take AI agents and workflows from prototype to production, including organizations that require private deployment, security review and audit. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Dify
Professional$590per workspace / year
Team$1,590per workspace / year
Sandbox$0free
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Community$0free
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Dify
- Self-hosting and strong data control
- Recommended as a no-code option
- Well suited for building AI-powered applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Dify”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-dify, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.