ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
LangChainThe open agent platform to own your intelligence
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs LangChain
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LangChain is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose LangChain if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 0.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($39 vs $167)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 10.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 2.7% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · LangChain 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LangChain leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayLangChain
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0LangChain ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Free; paid from $39 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud (SaaS), hybrid (SaaS control plane with self-hosted data plane), or self-hosted in the customer's VPC |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Community forum, Support portal, Email support, Slack |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series B, led by IVP |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Teams building agents that need control over models, context, memory and deployment, and the ability to test, govern and improve them in production |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
LangChain
Developer$0seat per month, then pay as you go
Plus$39seat per month, then pay as you go
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, then pay as you go
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
LangChain
- Stateful multi-agent orchestration via state graphs
- Strong open-source adoption with large download numbers
- Suited to enterprise agent loops
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs LangChain”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-langchain, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.