ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
LangGraphLow-level orchestration framework and runtime for long-running, stateful agents.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs LangGraph
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LangGraph is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 24.4 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You need ISO 27001 or CCPA coverage
Choose LangGraph if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (24.4 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or HIPAA coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | LangGraph |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 24.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 5.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 33 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · LangGraph 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LangGraph leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayLangGraph
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0LangGraph ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | LangGraph |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | SaaS in US and EU regions, plus self-hosted and hybrid options available on Enterprise only. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | — |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series B |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Teams building long-running, stateful AI agents. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
LangGraph
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
LangGraph
- Production standard for stateful, multi-agent workflows
- Strong engineering control for complex, cyclical agent logic
- Widely adopted open-source developer framework
- Best choice for autonomous AI agents
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding effort
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs LangGraph”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-langgraph, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.