Clay vs Lindy

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Lindy is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 7.4 versus 0.7 for Clay, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Clay if…

You need ISO 27001 or CCPA coverage
You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat

Choose Lindy if…

You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.4 vs 0.7)
You want a lower entry price ($29.99 vs $167)
You need HIPAA or PIPEDA coverage
Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric	Clay	Lindy
Visibility score	0.7%	7.4%
Change vs last week	New	New
Rank in AI Agents	#65	#17
Share of voice	0.2%	1.9%
Mentions this run	1	12
Positive in AI answers	33%	33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

Clay 0pp · Lindy 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Lindy leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT

AI Mode

9.1%

Perplexity

8.2%

ClayLindy

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Clay ranked higher

0Lindy ranked higher

Prompt	Engine	Clay	Lindy
Top AI agent platform options for B2B SaaS companies	AI Mode	#4	#5

Features, pricing & fit

Dimension	Clay	Lindy
Pricing model	Usage-based	Per seat
Entry price	Free; paid from $167 / mo	Free; paid from $29.99 per seat / mo
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Deployment	—	Cloud-hosted
Integrations	—	1500+
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA	SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, PIPEDA
Support	Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan	Live onboarding on the Team plan, Dedicated support on the Enterprise plan, Onboarding and enablement on the Enterprise plan, Documentation
Founded	2017	2023
Headquarters	New York City, NY, United States	San Francisco, CA, United States
Employees	1,001–5,000	11–50
Funding	Series B Expansion	Unspecified round
Best for	GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows.	Teams that run recurring multi-tool work such as reporting, support triage, reconciliation and incident follow-up.