ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
LlamaIndexTurn any document into agent-ready context.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs LlamaIndex
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LlamaIndex is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.2 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 20% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose LlamaIndex if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.2 vs 0.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($50 vs $167)
- You need HIPAA coverage
- Premier choice for RAG-centric agents
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 2.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #41 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 20% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · LlamaIndex 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LlamaIndex leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayLlamaIndex
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0LlamaIndex ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Free; paid from $50 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | LlamaParse runs as SaaS on a secure cloud tenant, or can be deployed in a customer's private VPC across cloud providers. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Community, Basic (email), Priority (Slack Connect), Dedicated |
| Founded | 2017 | — |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Strategic minority equity investments (Databricks, KPMG) · $28M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Teams in document-heavy industries such as finance, insurance, healthcare and manufacturing that need accurate parsing of complex tables, charts and scanned pages. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
LlamaIndex
- Premier choice for RAG-centric agents
- Named as a popular agent development framework
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs LlamaIndex”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-llamaindex, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.