ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
LyzrTake your AI agents to production, faster.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Lyzr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Lyzr is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 0.9 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You want a lower entry price ($167 vs $100,000)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Lyzr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.9 vs 0.7)
- You need ISO 42001 or HIPAA coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- specialized compliance and governance features for regulated environments
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Lyzr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 0.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #60 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Lyzr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Lyzr leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayLyzr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Lyzr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Lyzr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Free; paid from $100,000 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Hosted by Lyzr, in the customer's cloud, in their VPC, on-prem or air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Forward-deployed engineers who build alongside your team, Reimagineers who own the business result, Applied AI team for production rollout |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Jersey City, NJ |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series A+ · $15M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Enterprises that already run AI agents and need them governed and moved to production, especially in regulated industries such as banking, insurance and government. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Lyzr
Build$0free forever
Govern$100,000year, to start
Automate workflowsCustomcustom, scoped with you
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Lyzr
- specialized compliance and governance features for regulated environments
- limited management of broad, heterogeneous third-party agent estates
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Lyzr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-lyzr, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.