ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
OneReach.aiAgentic Orchestration Platform for the Enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs OneReach.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OneReach.ai is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You need ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose OneReach.ai if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0.7)
- You need UK Cyber Essentials or HITRUST coverage
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #58 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · OneReach.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OneReach.ai leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayOneReach.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0OneReach.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Dedicated Private Environment hosted in the customer's cloud or managed by OneReach, on public, private, government or sovereign infrastructure. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, UK Cyber Essentials, HITRUST |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | 24/7 support is standard across managed, infrastructure-only and combined service models |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Denver, CO |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Private equity round led by LoneTree Capital (listed as Growth Equity by Caplight) |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Large enterprises, especially in regulated industries such as government, finance and healthcare, that need many AI agents governed, costed and reused under central IT control. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
OneReach.ai
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
OneReach.ai
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs OneReach.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-onereach-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.