ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You need CCPA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · OutSystems 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayOutSystems
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0OutSystems ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
OutSystems
OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.