ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
PalantirWe build software that empowers organizations to effectively integrate their data, decisions, and operations.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Palantir
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Palantir is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or CCPA coverage
Choose Palantir if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 0.7)
- You need FedRAMP High or FISMA High or DoD IL5 or DoD IL6 or CMMC Level 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or HIPAA coverage
- Included in ISG's evaluated vendor landscape
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Palantir |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #53 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Palantir 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Palantir leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayPalantir
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Palantir ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Palantir |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Apollo deployment foundation used across highly secure and regulated environments, including FedRAMP, IL5 and IL6. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | FedRAMP High, FISMA High, DoD IL5, DoD IL6, CMMC Level 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | — |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Post-IPO equity round led by ARK Investment Management · $2460M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Federal agencies, state and local governments, international organizations and private companies. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Palantir
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Palantir
- Included in ISG's evaluated vendor landscape
- Placed in ISG's Merit tier, not the top tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Palantir”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-palantir, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.