ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
QuickMailGet hot leads on LinkedIn & cold email like a pro
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs QuickMail
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Clay is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.9 versus 0 for QuickMail.
Choose Clay if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.9 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose QuickMail if…
- You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $167)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | QuickMail |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.9% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.5% | no change0% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #25 | #54 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay −1.5000000000000004pp · QuickMail 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Clay leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayQuickMail
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0QuickMail ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | QuickMail |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | $49 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Expert support on all plans, Priority expert support on Growth and Agency plans |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Zug, Switzerland |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Undisclosed round |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Growth teams and lead generation agencies that run cold email and LinkedIn outreach |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs QuickMail”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-quickmail, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.