ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
Relevance AISpecialist AI Agents for Every Task
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Relevance AI
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Relevance AI is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 8 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Relevance AI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Relevance AI 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Relevance AI leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayRelevance AI
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Relevance AI ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Embedded deployment team, Dedicated account manager on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series A (unconfirmed, reported by Signalbase) · $37M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Enterprise teams in sales, customer success, marketing and HR that want non-technical staff to build and run their own agents. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Relevance AI
- visual drag-and-drop agent builder
- free tier
- prebuilt agent templates for sales, support, and operations
- hosted no-code agent builder useful for experimenting
- named best overall
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Relevance AI”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-relevance-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.