JumpCloudIntelligent, Secure IT
vs
OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
JumpCloud vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 25.8 for JumpCloud, and ranks ahead in 68% of the answers that name both.
Choose JumpCloud if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (58% vs 39% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 coverage
- unified identity, access, and device management
- transparent, published per-user pricing and annual savings
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 25.8)
- You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $9)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | JumpCloud | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 25.8% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.7% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #3 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 6.7% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 58% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
JumpCloud −2.5pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
JumpCloudOkta
Head to head in AI answers
31 engine answers name both brands
10JumpCloud ranked higher
21Okta ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | JumpCloud | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $9 per seat / mo | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | Standard support, Premium 24×7 support, Help Center, JumpCloud University | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 2012 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Louisville, Colorado, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series F · $400M raised | IPO |
| Best for | IT teams, from startups to enterprises and MSPs, that manage mixed-OS device fleets and want identity and device management in one platform. | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
JumpCloud
Device Management$9user/month, billed annually ($11 billed monthly)
SSO$11user/month, billed annually ($13 billed monthly)
Device Identity Management$13user/month, billed annually ($15 billed monthly)
Platform EssentialsCustomcontact sales
PlatformCustomcontact sales
Platform PrimeCustomcontact sales
Okta
Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
JumpCloud
- unified identity, access, and device management
- transparent, published per-user pricing and annual savings
- cross-platform support for Windows, Mac, and Linux
- free tier and free trial for small teams
- well suited to small and mid-sized businesses
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “JumpCloud vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jumpcloud-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.