Okta alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Okta
Microsoft Entra ID94% of Okta answersPing IdentityBest forLarge enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale56% of Okta answersJumpCloudBest forIT teams, from startups to enterprises and MSPs, that manage mixed-OS device fleets and want identity and device management in one platform.50% of Okta answersCyberArkBest forEnterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities.50% of Okta answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Okta has a visibility score of 56.9 in Identity & Access Management, #2 of 37. AI answers that name Okta most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Entra ID | — | — | 66% | Every Microsoft 365 tenant includes an Entra ID instance, so it is the built-in identity layer for Microsoft cloud services. |
| Ping Identity | Large enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale | — | 22.5% | Choice of multi-tenant cloud, dedicated cloud or self-managed deployment, with no-code orchestration across 350+ connectors |
| JumpCloud | IT teams, from startups to enterprises and MSPs, that manage mixed-OS device fleets and want identity and device management in one platform. | $9 per seat / mo | 25.8% | Combines a cloud directory, SSO/MFA, and cross-platform device management in a single platform. |
| CyberArk | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | — | 15.6% | Identity security centered on privileged access management, covering human and machine identities. |
Alternative 1
Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta →Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked #1 in Identity & Access Management.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 66% visibility score · #1 in Identity & Access Management
Key features
- Microsoft Entra ID Free — Entry tier of the Entra ID identity service.
- Microsoft Entra ID P1 — Core IAM capabilities including single sign-on, multi-factor authentication and Conditional Access.
- Microsoft Entra ID P2 — Everything in P1 plus ID Protection, Privileged Identity Management and identity governance such as access reviews.
- Microsoft Entra Connect — Synchronizes on-premises Active Directory with Entra ID (formerly Azure AD Connect).
Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta
| Dimension | Microsoft Entra ID | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 66% | 56.9% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | 30-day free trial |
Pros
- Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
- Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365
- Strong workforce IAM with SSO, MFA and passwordless access
- Top-ranked and recognised as a Leader among IAM providers
- Strong for enterprise identity governance and hybrid environments
Cons
- Advanced add-ons carry extra yearly paid subscription costs
- Advanced features such as Conditional Access require paid tiers
Alternative 2
Ping Identity vs Okta →Ping Identity
Ping Identity suits large enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 22.5% visibility score · #4 in Identity & Access Management
- 350+ native integrations
Key features
- PingOne — Multi-tenant cloud identity platform with managed services and automatic updates.
- PingOne Advanced Identity Cloud — Single-tenant cloud identity platform with dedicated infrastructure, managed by Ping.
- Ping Advanced Identity Software — Self-managed identity software for private, public, hybrid and on-premises environments.
- PingOne DaVinci — No-code, drag-and-drop identity orchestration service for designing and A/B testing user journeys.
Ping Identity vs Okta
| Dimension | Ping Identity | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 22.5% | 56.9% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | 30-day free trial |
Pros
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
- Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments
- Advanced federation, SSO, and directory services
- Strong customer identity (CIAM) and fraud prevention
- Highly rated by analysts and users
Cons
- Enterprise deployments can stretch budgets
Alternative 3
JumpCloud vs Okta →JumpCloud
JumpCloud suits iT teams, from startups to enterprises and MSPs, that manage mixed-OS device fleets and want identity and device management in one platform..
Quick facts
- $9 per seat / mo · per seat
- 30-day free trial
- 25.8% visibility score · #3 in Identity & Access Management
Key features
- Cloud Directory — Cloud-based user directory replacing on-premises Active Directory.
- Single Sign-On (SSO) — Single set of credentials for web and on-premises applications.
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) — Additional verification for access to resources.
- JumpCloud Go — Passwordless authentication.
JumpCloud vs Okta
| Dimension | JumpCloud | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 25.8% | 56.9% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $9 per seat / mo | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | 30-day free trial | 30-day free trial |
Pros
- unified identity, access, and device management
- transparent, published per-user pricing and annual savings
- cross-platform support for Windows, Mac, and Linux
- free tier and free trial for small teams
- well suited to small and mid-sized businesses
Cons
Alternative 4
CyberArk vs Okta →CyberArk
CyberArk suits enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 15.6% visibility score · #7 in Identity & Access Management
Key features
- Privileged Access Manager — Manages and secures privileged accounts across IT environments, self-hosted or SaaS.
- Endpoint Privilege Manager — Controls privileges on endpoints.
- Conjur Secrets Manager Enterprise — Secrets management for applications and DevOps.
- Vendor Privileged Access Manager — Privileged access for external vendors.
CyberArk vs Okta
| Dimension | CyberArk | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 56.9% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | 30-day free trial |
Pros
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Cons
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Okta | Per seat | $6 per seat / mo |
| Microsoft Entra ID | — | — |
| Ping Identity | — | — |
| JumpCloud | Per seat | $9 per seat / mo |
| CyberArk | — | — |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Okta in the latest weekly run.