CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
ConquerVoice and SMS inside Salesforce
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs Conquer
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0 for Conquer.
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
Choose Conquer if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Conquer |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−0.3% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #46 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · Conquer −0.3pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseConquer
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Close ranked higher
0Conquer ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Conquer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Native inside Salesforce, and also supports Microsoft Dynamics 365 |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Customer Success Manager |
| Founded | 2013 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Reno, Nevada, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Angel | Financing reported for the Full Circle Insights acquisition (listed as a debt round by Caplight and as a Series C by Pit |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Salesforce teams whose reps call and text existing customers, members or accounts every day |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Conquer
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Conquer
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Conquer”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-conquer, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.