CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
KixieBetter sales, made simple.
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs Kixie
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0.9 for Kixie.
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
Choose Kixie if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Kixie |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 0.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−0.7% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · Kixie −0.7999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseKixie
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Close ranked higher
0Kixie ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Kixie |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | — |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | US-based customer support, Live chat in the Kixie Dashboard, Support request form |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Santa Monica, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Angel | Seed |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Sales, business development, marketing, and inside sales teams that call and text prospects from within their CRM. |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Kixie
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Kixie”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-kixie, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.