Close vs monday.com
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
monday.com is the stronger AI pick in CRM: it has a visibility score of 10.1 versus 7.3 for Close, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Close if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 33% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
Choose monday.com if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.1 vs 7.3)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need more native integrations (850+ vs 100+)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27032:2023 or ISO/IEC 27701:2019 or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | monday.com |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.3% | 10.1% |
| Change vs last week | down−1% | down−2.3% |
| Rank in CRM | #10 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 4% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.8999999999999995pp · monday.com −2.200000000000001pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
monday.com leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Close | monday.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best CRM tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #9 | #5 |
| Which CRM tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
| Which CRM tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #7 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | monday.com |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud |
| Integrations | 100+ | 850+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27032:2023, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Help center, 24/7 support, Enterprise onboarding and training, Webinars |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Angel | Post-IPO Equity · $235M raised |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Teams that want their CRM on the same platform as their project and delivery work |
Plans side by side
Close
monday.com
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
monday.com
- Highly customizable visual boards and workspace
- Strong workflow automation
- User-friendly and quick to onboard teams
- Top ratings and high user satisfaction
- Clear, transparent per-seat pricing tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs monday.com”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-monday-com, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.