CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
QuickMailGet hot leads on LinkedIn & cold email like a pro
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs QuickMail
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0 for QuickMail.
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0)
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $49)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Choose QuickMail if…
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | QuickMail |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | no change0% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #54 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · QuickMail 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseQuickMail
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Close ranked higher
0QuickMail ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | QuickMail |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | $49 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud-based |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Expert support on all plans, Priority expert support on Growth and Agency plans |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Zug, Switzerland |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Angel | Undisclosed round |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Growth teams and lead generation agencies that run cold email and LinkedIn outreach |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
QuickMail
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs QuickMail”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-quickmail, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.