CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
Snov.ioFind leads, enrich them with emails and phone numbers, and send cold outreach
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs Snov.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0 for Snov.io.
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0)
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $39)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or CCPA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Snov.io if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need more native integrations (5000+ vs 100+)
- You need LOA certified coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Snov.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | no change0% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #56 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · Snov.io 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseSnov.io
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Close ranked higher
0Snov.io ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Snov.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $39 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | — |
| Integrations | 100+ | 5000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | GDPR, LOA certified |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Help Center, Prioritized 24-hour support, Personal implementation manager |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Angel | ICO |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Small and midsized B2B sales and marketing teams that want lead search, cold email and LinkedIn outreach in one platform |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Snov.io
Trial$0month
Starter$39month
Pro S$99month
Pro M$189month
Pro L$369month
Ultra$738month
Custom UltraCustommonth
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Snov.io
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Snov.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-snov-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.