ConcordContract Management You Don't Have to Manage
vs
IcertisAI-native contract intelligence
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Concord vs Icertis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Concord is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 3.3 for Icertis.
Choose Concord if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 3.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or CSA STAR Level One coverage
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
Choose Icertis if…
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Concord | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #20 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concord 0pp · Icertis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Concord leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ConcordIcertis
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Concord ranked higher
0Icertis ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concord | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $499 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Public or private cloud |
| Integrations | 5000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level One | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA |
| Support | Self-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer support | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, US | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $39M raised | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt |
| Best for | Mid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal. | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts |
Plans side by side
Concord
Essentials$499month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Business$899month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Enterprise$1,299month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concord
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
- less proposal-oriented
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Icertis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-icertis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.