ConcordContract Management You Don't Have to Manage
vs
LoopioAI RFP Software Built for the People Behind Every RFP
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Concord vs Loopio
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loopio is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 6 versus 3.6 for Concord.
Choose Concord if…
- You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or GDPR or CSA STAR Level One coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
Choose Loopio if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6 vs 3.6)
- You need GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Concord | Loopio |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #20 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 12 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 46% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concord 0pp · Loopio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loopio leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ConcordLoopio
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Concord ranked higher
0Loopio ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concord | Loopio |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $499 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Cloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Integrations | 5000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level One | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant |
| Support | Self-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer support | Onboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app support |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, US | Toronto, Canada |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $39M raised | Strategic investment from Sumeru Equity Partners |
| Best for | Mid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal. | Proposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires. |
Plans side by side
Concord
Essentials$499month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Business$899month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Enterprise$1,299month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concord
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
- less proposal-oriented
Loopio
- Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
- Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
- Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Loopio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-loopio, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.