Skip to content
SlateIndex
LoopioAI RFP Software Built for the People Behind Every RFP
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Loopio vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 6 for Loopio, and ranks ahead in 42% of the answers that name both.

Choose Loopio if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage
  • Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
  • Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses

Choose Responsive if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 6)
  • You need GDPR or AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Loopio Responsive
Visibility score6%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#15#10
Share of voice2.2%4%
Mentions this run1220
Positive in AI answers46%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Loopio 6%

Loopio 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Responsive leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.6%
3%
AI Mode
6.7%
15.7%
Perplexity
8.9%
13.3%
LoopioResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

12 engine answers name both brands

7Loopio ranked higher
5Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLoopioResponsive
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceContact sales$10,000 / mo
Free planNoNo
DeploymentCloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web ServicesFlexible hosting options
Integrations—32+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliantGDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
SupportOnboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app supportProfessional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20142015
HeadquartersToronto, CanadaFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees201–500501–1,000
FundingStrategic investment from Sumeru Equity PartnersRound led by Elevate Capital
Best forProposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires.Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

Loopio

FoundationsCustom
EnhancedCustom
EnterpriseCustom
Loopio pricing

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Loopio

  • Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
  • Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
  • Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool

    Responsive

    • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
    • Designed for complex enterprise responses
    • Top pick for RFP response management
    • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
    • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loopio vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loopio-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.