Skip to content
SlateIndex
LoopioAI RFP Software Built for the People Behind Every RFP
vs
ProposifyProposal software that gives you control and insight into the close.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Loopio vs Proposify

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 6 for Loopio, and ranks ahead in 73% of the answers that name both.

Choose Loopio if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Centralized reusable content management for RFPs

Choose Proposify if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 46% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Loopio Proposify
Visibility score6%41.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#15#2
Share of voice2.2%9.4%
Mentions this run1249
Positive in AI answers46%49%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Loopio 6%

Loopio 0pp · Proposify 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Proposify leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.6%
50.9%
AI Mode
6.7%
39.3%
Perplexity
8.9%
33.9%
LoopioProposify

Head to head in AI answers

11 engine answers name both brands

3Loopio ranked higher
8Proposify ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLoopioProposify
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact sales$49 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo · 14-day trial
DeploymentCloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web ServicesCloud-hosted SaaS
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliantSOC 2 Type 2, GDPR
SupportOnboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app supportEmail and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority support
Founded20142013
HeadquartersToronto, CanadaHalifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Employees201–50051–200
FundingStrategic investment from Sumeru Equity PartnersGrowth Equity - II (CB Insights)
Best forProposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires.Busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction.

Plans side by side

Loopio

FoundationsCustom
EnhancedCustom
EnterpriseCustom
Loopio pricing

Proposify

Build$49user/month (monthly); $39/user/mo billed annually ($468/user/year)
Grow$65user/month, billed annually ($780/user/year)
Scale$12,800year platform fee, includes 10 users; extra users $780/user/year
Proposify pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Loopio

  • Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
  • Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
  • Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool

    Proposify

    • Visually rich, branded proposal design
    • Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
    • Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
    • Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
    • Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loopio vs Proposify”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loopio-vs-proposify, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.