Skip to content
SlateIndex
ConcordContract Management You Don't Have to Manage
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Concord vs Qwilr

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 3.6 for Concord, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Concord if…

  • You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or GDPR or CSA STAR Level One coverage
  • free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures

Choose Qwilr if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 3.6)
  • You want a lower entry price ($35 vs $499)
  • You need PCI-DSS coverage
  • Interactive, web-based proposals

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Concord Qwilr
Visibility score3.6%28.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#20#4
Share of voice1.1%7.2%
Mentions this run637
Positive in AI answers—51%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Concord 4%

Concord 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.5%
30.2%
AI Mode
3.1%
26.9%
Perplexity
4.1%
27.8%
ConcordQwilr

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

0Concord ranked higher
2Qwilr ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionConcordQwilr
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry price$499 per seat / mo$35 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo · 14-day trial
DeploymentCloud-basedWeb-based, web-native software
Integrations5000+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level OneSOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS
SupportSelf-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer supportEmail support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions
Founded20142014
HeadquartersAustin, Texas, USRedfern, New South Wales, Australia
Employees51–20051–200
FundingLater-stage VC · $39M raisedSeries A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised
Best forMid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal.Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement.

Plans side by side

Concord

Essentials$499month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Business$899month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Enterprise$1,299month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Concord pricing

Qwilr

Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Qwilr pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Concord

  • free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
  • less proposal-oriented

Qwilr

  • Interactive, web-based proposals
  • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
  • Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
  • Lower cost with annual billing
  • 14-day free trial available

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.