ConcordContract Management You Don't Have to Manage
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Concord vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 3.6 for Concord, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Concord if…
- You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or GDPR or CSA STAR Level One coverage
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 3.6)
- You want a lower entry price ($35 vs $499)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Concord | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #20 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concord 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ConcordQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Concord ranked higher
2Qwilr ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Concord | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a proposal and contract tool for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #6 | #3 |
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #10 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concord | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $499 per seat / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 5000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level One | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Self-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, US | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $39M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Mid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal. | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Concord
Essentials$499month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Business$899month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Enterprise$1,299month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concord
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
- less proposal-oriented
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.