Conga CLM vs Loopio
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Conga CLM is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 7.3 versus 6 for Loopio, and ranks ahead in 71% of the answers that name both.
Choose Conga CLM if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.3 vs 6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 46% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or HIPAA or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Loopio if…
- You need GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage
- Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
- Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
- Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Conga CLM | Loopio |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.3% | 6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #13 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 12 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 46% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Conga CLM 0pp · Loopio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Conga CLM leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Conga CLM | Loopio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #10 | #11 |
| Best proposal and contract tool for enterprise | AI Mode | #1 | #4 |
| Best proposal and contract tool for enterprise | Perplexity | #4 | #7 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #4 | #9 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #8 | #2 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #13 | #5 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | Perplexity | #8 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Conga CLM | Loopio |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Flexible deployment options | Cloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, HIPAA, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant |
| Support | — | Onboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app support |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Houston, Texas, United States | Toronto, Canada |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Venture round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures | Strategic investment from Sumeru Equity Partners |
| Best for | Large enterprises and high-growth businesses whose commercial complexity across sales, legal, finance and IT is high. | Proposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires. |
Plans side by side
Conga CLM
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Conga CLM
- Enterprise-grade document generation, CPQ, and contract lifecycle management
- Deep integration with CRM ecosystems and Salesforce
- Suited to complex sales cycles and complex, multi-layered agreement workflows
- Stronger choice for broader contract and agreement management
- Proposal generation integrated with broader CRM and document workflows
Loopio
- Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
- Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
- Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CLM vs Loopio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-clm-vs-loopio, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.