Conga CPQProposals & Contracts
vs
JuroIntelligent contracting is here.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Conga CPQ vs Juro
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Juro is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 6 versus 0.3 for Conga CPQ.
Choose Conga CPQ if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 62% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Choose Juro if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- browser-native contract collaboration
- collaborative contracts that bypass legal bottlenecks
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Conga CPQ | Juro |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #44 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 2.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 62% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Conga CPQ 0pp · Juro 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Juro leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Conga CPQJuro
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Conga CPQ ranked higher
0Juro ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Conga CPQ | Juro |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS, mainly as a Salesforce-native application | Cloud-based, browser-based |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | — | Help center, Implementation team, In-app chat |
| Founded | 2006 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Houston, Texas | London, United Kingdom |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures | Series B · $39M raised |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise buyers | Fast-growing businesses whose sales, HR and operations teams need to create and send contracts without waiting on legal, while legal keeps control of templates and review. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Conga CPQ
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Juro
- browser-native contract collaboration
- collaborative contracts that bypass legal bottlenecks
- suits startups with an in-house legal team
- modern contract workflows
- covers many contract types such as MSAs, SaaS agreements, DPAs and NDAs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CPQ vs Juro”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-cpq-vs-juro, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.