Conga CPQ vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 0.3 for Conga CPQ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Conga CPQ if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 51% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 0.3)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Conga CPQ | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #44 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Conga CPQ 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Conga CPQ | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #12 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Conga CPQ | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS, mainly as a Salesforce-native application | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | — | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Houston, Texas | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise buyers | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Conga CPQ
Pricing not available.
Qwilr
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Conga CPQ
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CPQ vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-cpq-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.