Conga CPQ alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Conga CPQ
PandaDocBest forSales, revenue and operations teams producing proposals, quotes and contracts100% of Conga CPQ answersProposifyBest forBusy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction.100% of Conga CPQ answersQwilrBest forSales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement.100% of Conga CPQ answersBetter ProposalsBest forSmall businesses, freelancers and service businesses that send proposals, contracts and onboarding documents.100% of Conga CPQ answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Conga CPQ has a visibility score of 0.3 in Proposals & Contracts, #44 of 55. AI answers that name Conga CPQ most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc | Sales, revenue and operations teams producing proposals, quotes and contracts | — | 79.8% | — |
| Proposify | Busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction. | $49 per seat / mo | 41.4% | Pulls pricing and details directly from your CRM and lets admins lock proposal elements so reps cannot send errors. |
| Qwilr | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | $35 per seat / mo | 28.3% | Proposals built as interactive web pages, with e-signature and payment in the same flow and buyer engagement tracking. |
| Better Proposals | Small businesses, freelancers and service businesses that send proposals, contracts and onboarding documents. | $13 per seat / mo | 26.1% | One platform covers proposal creation, open tracking, e-signature and post-signature onboarding, with human support. |
Alternative 1
PandaDoc vs Conga CPQ →PandaDoc
PandaDoc suits sales, revenue and operations teams producing proposals, quotes and contracts.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 79.8% visibility score · #1 in Proposals & Contracts
Key features
- PandaDoc Documents — Drag-and-drop document editor with templates, a pricing-table and content library, and approval workflows.
- CPQ — Configure, price and quote tool used within proposals and sales documents.
- eSignature — Electronic signatures for proposals, quotes and contracts.
- Deal Rooms — Shared spaces for managing documents during a deal.
PandaDoc vs Conga CPQ
| Dimension | PandaDoc | Conga CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 79.8% | 0.3% |
| Pricing model | — | — |
| Entry price | — | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- All-in-one document workflows covering proposals, quotes, contracts, and e-signatures
- Widely considered a market leader and top-rated for proposals and contracts
- Intuitive drag-and-drop proposal creation with template libraries
- Free plan for basic e-signatures and proposals
- Annual billing lowers the cost of paid tiers
Cons
- Costs rise as teams scale up
- Free plan has usage limits
Alternative 2
Proposify vs Conga CPQ →Proposify
Proposify suits busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction..
Quick facts
- $49 per seat / mo · per seat
- 14-day free trial
- 41.4% visibility score · #2 in Proposals & Contracts
Key features
- Proposal editor — Drag-and-drop editor for branded proposals, quotes and agreements, with templates and a content library.
- eSignatures — Legally binding e-signatures that prospects can complete from any device.
- Tracking and analytics — Notifications when prospects open a document, with time spent in each section.
- Workflow automation and approvals — Role permissions, approval rules on price or discount, and Zapier-style automation rules.
Proposify vs Conga CPQ
| Dimension | Proposify | Conga CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 41.4% | 0.3% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $49 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Trial | 14-day free trial | — |
Pros
- Visually rich, branded proposal design
- Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
- Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
- Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
- Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost
Cons
Alternative 3
Qwilr vs Conga CPQ →Qwilr
Qwilr suits sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement..
Quick facts
- $35 per seat / mo · per seat
- 14-day free trial
- 28.3% visibility score · #4 in Proposals & Contracts
Key features
- Proposals — Interactive, web-native sales proposals with e-signature, payments and buyer engagement tracking.
- Quotes — CRM-generated quotes and interactive pricing plans, with e-sign and payment in one flow.
- QwilrPay — Payment collection from proposals and quotes, with fees varying by plan.
- AI Proposal Creator — A standalone AI tool that creates proposals, offered free to use.
Qwilr vs Conga CPQ
| Dimension | Qwilr | Conga CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 28.3% | 0.3% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Trial | 14-day free trial | — |
Pros
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Cons
Alternative 4
Better Proposals vs Conga CPQ →Better Proposals
Better Proposals suits small businesses, freelancers and service businesses that send proposals, contracts and onboarding documents..
Quick facts
- $13 per seat / mo · per seat
- 14-day free trial
- 26.1% visibility score · #5 in Proposals & Contracts
Key features
- Create — Web-based editor with automatic design, branded templates and a reusable content library.
- Send — Web-link proposals with interactive pricing tables, live chat and open tracking.
- Follow Up — Single-screen follow-up view showing which clients need a nudge, based on their activity.
- Get it signed — Legally binding digital signatures collected at the point the client decides.
Better Proposals vs Conga CPQ
| Dimension | Better Proposals | Conga CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 26.1% | 0.3% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $13 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Trial | 14-day free trial | — |
Pros
- Fast proposal creation and implementation
- Low-cost, budget-friendly pricing with annual discounts
- Ready-to-go industry template library
- Polished, attractive proposals that look like micro-websites
- Suited to freelancers and small agencies, with built-in payment collection
Cons
- Narrower focus on proposals than broader contract suites
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Conga CPQ | — | — |
| PandaDoc | — | — |
| Proposify | Per seat | $49 per seat / mo |
| Qwilr | Per seat | $35 per seat / mo |
| Better Proposals | Per seat | $13 per seat / mo |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Conga CPQ in the latest weekly run.