ConsensusUnleash your demo, unlock revenue.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Consensus vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Consensus is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Consensus if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 1.5)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Strong ratings and reviews for sales enablement
- Well suited to buyer collaboration and self-guided evaluation
Choose Qwilr if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 29% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Consensus | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #18 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 29% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Consensus 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Consensus leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ConsensusQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Consensus ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Consensus | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | — | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | — | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Investment from Sumeru Equity Partners | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Revenue teams in presales, sales, marketing, customer success and channel that want buyers to view product demos on their own terms. | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Consensus
Pricing not available.
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Consensus
- Strong ratings and reviews for sales enablement
- Well suited to buyer collaboration and self-guided evaluation
- Powerful platform for buyer-facing demos and engagement
- Publicly documented discounts are easy to find
- Generally a poor fit for early startups
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Consensus vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/consensus-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.