Skip to content
SlateIndex
ContentsquareAI-first experience platform for every human and agent journey
vs
HotjarHotjar is now Contentsquare: heatmaps, recordings and surveys.
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3

Contentsquare vs Hotjar

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Contentsquare is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 11.8 versus 2.2 for Hotjar, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Contentsquare if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (11.8 vs 2.2)
  • You need more native integrations (115+ vs 10+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 6% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or ISO 9001:2015 coverage

Choose Hotjar if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($39 vs $49)
  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 coverage
  • Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
  • Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Contentsquare Hotjar
Visibility score11.8%2.2%
Change vs last weekup+2%up+0.8%
Rank in Product Analytics#8#16
Share of voice4.5%0.7%
Mentions this run213
Positive in AI answers33%6%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Contentsquare 12%

Contentsquare +2pp · Hotjar +0.8000000000000003pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Contentsquare leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.3%
3.5%
AI Mode
12.2%
3.1%
Perplexity
11.8%
0%
ContentsquareHotjar

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1Contentsquare ranked higher
1Hotjar ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionContentsquareHotjar
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $49 / moFree; paid from $39 / mo
Free planYesYes
Integrations115+10+
ComplianceISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, SOC 2 Type 2
SupportAI-powered support on the Free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Dedicated support and SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer success manager on EnterpriseAI-powered support on the free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Community, Education
Founded2012—
HeadquartersParis, France—
Employees1,001–5,000—
FundingSeries F—
Best forDigital teams at large enterprise and mid-market brands that want to understand and improve journeys across web and apps. The Free plan suits first-time users, and Enterprise suits large teams.Midsize and SMB businesses that want heatmaps, session recordings and surveys in one product experience platform.

Plans side by side

Contentsquare

Free$0forever (up to 200k monthly sessions)
Growth$49month (from 7k monthly sessions; $39/month billed yearly)
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Contentsquare pricing

Hotjar

Free$0forever
Growth$39month, billed yearly ($49 billed monthly); from 7k monthly sessions
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Hotjar pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Contentsquare

  • Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
  • Session replay and UX friction insights
  • Strong G2 rating from many reviews
  • Recognised market leader in digital experience analytics
  • Free tier available for small projects
  • Paid plans require custom quotes rather than transparent pricing

Hotjar

  • Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
  • Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data
  • Basic free tier or trial available

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Contentsquare vs Hotjar”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contentsquare-vs-hotjar, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.