HotjarHotjar is now Contentsquare: heatmaps, recordings and surveys.
vs
PostHogYour product's context layer.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Hotjar vs PostHog
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
PostHog is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 21 versus 4.9 for Hotjar, and ranks ahead in 57% of the answers that name both.
Choose Hotjar if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 coverage
- Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
- Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data
- Basic free tier or trial available
Choose PostHog if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21 vs 4.9)
- You need more native integrations (926+ vs 10+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 6% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Hotjar | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.9% | 21% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #15 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 6.1% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 32 |
| Positive in AI answers | 6% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hotjar 0pp · PostHog 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
PostHog leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HotjarPostHog
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
3Hotjar ranked higher
4PostHog ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Hotjar | PostHog |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a web analytics tool for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #7 | #5 |
| What are the best Web Analytics tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #10 | #6 |
| Compare the leading Web Analytics platforms | Perplexity | #7 | #11 |
| Which Web Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #13 | #7 |
| Which Web Analytics tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #4 | #7 |
| Official website of the top web analytics tool vendors | ChatGPT | #16 | #7 |
| Official website of the top web analytics tool vendors | Perplexity | #7 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hotjar | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $39 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | PostHog Cloud in US or EU regions, or self-hosted |
| Integrations | 10+ | 926+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | AI-powered support on the free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Community, Education | Community support on the free plan, Email support on pay-as-you-go, Slack support for plans over $2k/mo, Paid onboarding call |
| Founded | — | 2020 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series E |
| Best for | Midsize and SMB businesses that want heatmaps, session recordings and surveys in one product experience platform. | Product engineers, product managers, growth engineers and founders who want analytics, session replay, flags and experiments in one platform. |
Plans side by side
Hotjar
Free$0forever
Growth$39month, billed yearly ($49 billed monthly); from 7k monthly sessions
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Hotjar
- Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
- Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data
- Basic free tier or trial available
PostHog
- Open-source, developer-first platform
- All-in-one bundle of analytics, session replay, feature flags and A/B testing
- Transparent, public pay-as-you-go pricing
- Generous free tier for small teams
- Strong adoption and best value for startups
- Pricing often requires sales-assisted quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hotjar vs PostHog”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hotjar-vs-posthog, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.