ContractbookHelping businesses scale with future-proof contracts
vs
IcertisAI-native contract intelligence
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Contractbook vs Icertis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Icertis is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.6 for Contractbook.
Choose Contractbook if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or eIDAS coverage
Choose Icertis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.6)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Contractbook | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.6% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #41 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Contractbook 0pp · Icertis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Icertis leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ContractbookIcertis
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Contractbook ranked higher
0Icertis ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Contractbook | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Public or private cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, eIDAS | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA |
| Support | Live chat, Email, Phone support, Help Centre | — |
| Founded | — | 2009 |
| Headquarters | — | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series B · $44M raised | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt |
| Best for | Small and growing companies that handle high volumes of low-complexity contracts | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts |
Plans side by side
Contractbook
EssentialCustommonth, billed annually
CentralizeCustommonth, billed annually
AccelerateCustommonth, billed annually
CustomCustom
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Contractbook
Profile in progress.
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Contractbook vs Icertis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contractbook-vs-icertis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.