ContractSafeEasy, AI-powered contract management software
vs
IcertisAI-native contract intelligence
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
ContractSafe vs Icertis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Icertis is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 1.4 for ContractSafe.
Choose ContractSafe if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 40% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
Choose Icertis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 1.4)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | ContractSafe | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #34 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ContractSafe 0pp · Icertis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Icertis leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ContractSafeIcertis
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ContractSafe ranked higher
0Icertis ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ContractSafe | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Onboarding fee | Included | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on Amazon Web Services, with data residency in the US, EU, Canada or Australia | Public or private cloud |
| Integrations | 6+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, TX-RAMP Level 2 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA |
| Support | 24/5 support, Email, chat and phone support, Robust help center, Dedicated customer success manager | — |
| Founded | 2015 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Malibu, California | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Growth investment from Five Elms Capital · $28M raised | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt |
| Best for | Growing organizations, most often 50 to 1,000 people, where one person such as a general counsel, finance lead, or contracts, compliance or procurement manager owns the contracts and everyone else needs to find, track and sign them | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts |
Plans side by side
ContractSafe
OrganizeCustommonth, prepaid annually; based on contract volume
FinalizeCustommonth, prepaid annually; based on contract volume
MaximizeCustommonth, prepaid annually; based on contract volume
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ContractSafe
Profile in progress.
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ContractSafe vs Icertis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contractsafe-vs-icertis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.