CoresignalData intelligence layer for AI agents
vs
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Coresignal vs Greenhouse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 0 for Coresignal.
Choose Coresignal if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need Certified by the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative coverage
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Coresignal | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 38.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #73 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 8.1% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 43 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Coresignal 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CoresignalGreenhouse
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Coresignal ranked higher
0Greenhouse ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Coresignal | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $49 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Data APIs, bulk datasets delivered as JSON or CSV, and a hosted MCP server. | — |
| Compliance | Certified by the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS |
| Support | Email, Account manager, Slack (higher-tier plans) | — |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | — | Series D · $110M raised |
| Best for | Teams building AI agents, sales tech, HR tech, investment, and market research workflows that need fresh B2B company, employee, and jobs data. | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises |
Plans side by side
Coresignal
Free tier$0free
Mini$49month
Starter$199month
Pro$499month
Growth$1,000month
Premium$1,500month
Scale$3,000month
Elite$5,000month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Coresignal
Profile in progress.
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Coresignal vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/coresignal-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.