Greenhouse alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Greenhouse
LeverBest forSmall, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations.67% of Greenhouse answersWorkableBest forCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.54% of Greenhouse answersWorkday43% of Greenhouse answersiCIMSBest forLarge enterprises that need to hire at scale43% of Greenhouse answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Greenhouse has a visibility score of 38.5 in Recruiting, #1 of 83. AI answers that name Greenhouse most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lever | Small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations. | — | 22.2% | ATS and CRM combined in one platform, with AI built across the hiring funnel rather than added through separate tools. |
| Workable | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. | $299 / mo | 30.1% | An AI agent built into a full applicant tracking system, which reads the system of record before it acts and inherits the platform's security and access model. |
| Workday | — | — | 18.3% | — |
| iCIMS | Large enterprises that need to hire at scale | — | 13.8% | An intelligent hiring platform powered by insights from billions of hiring interactions |
Alternative 1
Lever vs Greenhouse →Lever
Lever suits small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 22.2% visibility score · #3 in Recruiting
Key features
- Lever AI-Powered Hiring Platform — ATS and CRM in one platform with reporting, AI screening, unlimited AI interview transcripts and summaries, and AI fraud prevention signals.
- Candidate Insights — Add-on that surfaces skills, fit, assessments and reference data in the candidate profile.
- AI Screening by VONQ — Add-on that pre-screens candidates with AI agents embedded in the career site.
- Onboarding — Add-on for automated new hire workflows, task management and document collection.
Lever vs Greenhouse
| Dimension | Lever | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 22.2% | 38.5% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
- Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
- Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies
Cons
Alternative 2
Workable vs Greenhouse →Workable
Workable suits companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses..
Quick facts
- $299 / mo · flat tiers
- 15-day free trial
- 30.1% visibility score · #2 in Recruiting
- 270+ native integrations
Key features
- Workable ATS — Applicant tracking system covering requisitions, sourcing, pipelines, interviews, offers and analytics.
- Workable Agent — AI recruiting agents that source, screen and engage candidates inside the ATS, sold as four agents including Sourcing, Screening and Engagement.
- Workable HR — HR information system with employee onboarding, time off, time tracking, e-signatures and payroll preparation.
- Performance & Engagement — 360-degree performance reviews, performance tracking and employee surveys, sold as an add-on.
Workable vs Greenhouse
| Dimension | Workable | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 30.1% | 38.5% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $299 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | 15-day free trial | — |
Pros
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
Cons
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Alternative 3
Workday vs Greenhouse →Workday
Workday is ranked #6 in Recruiting.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 18.3% visibility score · #6 in Recruiting
Key features
- Workday Expense Management — Employee expense reporting unified with Workday Financial Management and HCM, with receipt scanning, spend authorizations and freezes.
Workday vs Greenhouse
| Dimension | Workday | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 18.3% | 38.5% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Strong for large enterprise HCM and workforce management
- Seamless integration within broader HR and finance ecosystem
- Deep analytics and enterprise core
- Fast out-of-the-box integrations with standard systems
Cons
Alternative 4
iCIMS vs Greenhouse →iCIMS
iCIMS suits large enterprises that need to hire at scale.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 13.8% visibility score · #11 in Recruiting
- 10000+ native integrations
Key features
- iCIMS Hire — Configurable enterprise applicant tracking system with onboarding management and text recruiting.
- High Volume Hiring — Conversational candidate experience and mobile hiring workspace synced with the ATS for high-volume hiring.
- iCIMS Engage — Automated sourcing and nurture campaigns for candidate experience management.
- iCIMS Employer Branding — Career sites, video testimonials and tools to build an employer brand.
iCIMS vs Greenhouse
| Dimension | iCIMS | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 13.8% | 38.5% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- enterprise-grade, high-volume talent acquisition platform
- robust analytics and AI screening and tracking
- recognised market leader in enterprise recruiting
- suited to complex, multi-location hiring at scale
Cons
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse | Flat tiers | Contact sales |
| Lever | — | — |
| Workable | Flat tiers | $299 / mo |
| Workday | — | — |
| iCIMS | — | — |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Greenhouse in the latest weekly run.